Summary reader response Draft #2
Kok's article "Go-Ahead
Singapore rolls out 6-month trial of public buses with solar panels"
(2021) informs the public about the implementation of a project done by
Go-Ahead, a bus operator in Singapore. In order to utilise solar energy to reduce
fuel consumption and carbon emission, Go-Ahead has installed "1.6mm thick,
flexible, and shatterproof" solar panels on two diesel-powered buses in
Singapore, over a 6-month trial period. Kok reported that the two
combined solar panels generate up to 1,000 watts of energy to charge the buses'
batteries, thereby reducing the batteries' reliance on the alternator. This
lessens the strain on the buses' engines, saving 1,400 litres of diesel, and
reducing 3,700 tonnes of carbon emissions, per bus, annually. These figures are
extrapolated from data in the United Kingdom, but the project is expected to do
better here—given Singapore’ sunny climate. Kok stated that Go-Ahead used
lightweight panels (i.e total of 20kg), which is "three times thinner as
compared to conventional ones". Partnering with the Land Transport
Authority, the buses have undergone safety assessments and are approved for
public road trials. Evaluation regarding the panels’ ability to withstand high
temperatures and daily washing would also be tested. From the expenses saved
due to fuel reduction, Go-Ahead expects to recuperate the costs of the trial
within four years. If successful, more solar panels may be installed on
Singapore buses. With fossil fuel running low and global warming on the rise,
Go-Ahead Singapore is looking at new ways to replace the use of fuel on buses.
Solar panels should replace fuel for energy in buses, due to their abilities in
energy generation, cost reduction, as well as their eco-friendliness.
Firstly, pertaining to the generation of energy, most of the fossil fuel
sources now are limited, and would run out due to the increased demands (Kumar,
2020). Renewable energy such as that from the sun is used to reduce the
dependence on fossil energy and to increase energy efficiency (Rehman et al.,
2022). This is especially good if the geographic locations are suitable. For
instance, Indonesia is a country that consists of many tropical regions, that
is frequently exposed to sunlight throughout the year (Lorensia et al., 2020;
Wijoyo & Prihatiningtyas, 2019). Similarly, Singapore is located "70
miles from the Equator” and is a country with "among the world's highest
ultraviolet index score" (Nyiri, 2005). This signals that Singapore is
also frequently exposed to sunlight, and we can take advantage of solar energy
to generate electrical energy. Furthermore, recent improvements in the
manufacturing of solar cells allow solar panels to provide high quality,
efficient, and uninterruptible energy—to meet the increased demands of energy (Choifin
et al., 2021).
Secondly, regarding costs, oil is the most frequently used fuel to
generate electricity because it is easily accessible and easily stored
(Stephen, 2005). However, due to the overconsumption of oil to produce energy,
it has become scarce (Kirsch, 2020), and its prices are now highly inflated
(Sek et al., 2015). In comparison, renewable energy such as solar and wind
power are unlimited and are cheaper per unit energy as compared to crude oil
(Kåberger, 2018). Hence, replacing oil with renewable energy is a more
cost-efficient alternative in the long run. Notedly, solar panels are required
to convert solar power to electrical energy for utility. Although solar panels
used to be rather costly, progress has been made such that the production of
solar panels is now cheaper (Bilgen, 2000).
Thirdly, solar panels are more eco-friendly. Regular buses require the
burning of fossil fuel for combustion--this generates high carbon emissions and
air pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (Bertrand, 2021). This causes adverse
changes in the climate and may lead to consequences such as wildfires and
floods (Bell et al., 2017). As of now, transportation is heavily responsible
for air pollution associated with combustion (Erikson & Jennings,, 2017).
Replacing diesel-powered buses with solar-powered ones, to generate
electricity, would mitigate these emissions, and increase air quality in the
environment. As of now, many cities in Sweden, China, and California are
starting to implement solar-powered buses (Erikson et al., 2017). The long-term
effects of many countries endorsing the use of solar panels would ultimately
aid in reducing global warming and rising sea levels Giannadaki et al.,
2016).
However, a major concern regarding electric buses is that energy savings
may be inefficient. This is because large battery packs are required to store
adequate energy for a certain driving range (Xue & Gwee, 2017). In general,
around 35% of the total mass of the bus is the battery alone. In order to travel
long distances, big buses would require larger battery packs, which would
increase the weight of the buses (Muttana, 2017). This would cause the
power-to-weight ratio to be inefficient, thereby compromising on the buses’
energy savings. However, there are weight-reduction efforts in the designs of
buses recently, such as by substituting buses' bodies with aluminum rather than
steel. Hence, there is good potential to develop fully integrated
solar-electric buses because we know that implementations such as using
lighter-weight buses enhance the energy efficiency generated by solar panels
(Muttana, 2017).
In conclusion, there is evidence that solar panels are efficient in
terms of energy conversion. Moreover, solar panels draw from a source of
renewable energy that is unlimited, making them both cost-efficient and
affordable. Furthermore, utilising solar panels to generate electricity reduces
the release of carbon emissions, which is eco-friendly and better for the
environment. Notedly, one argument is that heavy battery packs needed to power
the buses would reduce energy-saving efficiencies. However, there are methods
to reduce the weight of buses to curb this issue and ensure an effective
power-to-weight ratio. Therefore, solar panels have great potential for
replacing fuel due to their capabilities.
References
Bilgen E . (2000). Passive solar massive wall systems
with fins attached on the heated wall and without glazing. Journal of Solar
Energy Engineering, 122(1), 30-34. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.556274
Choifin, M., Rodli, A. F., Sari, A. K., Wahjoedi, T.
& Aziz, A. (2021). A study of renewable energy and solar panel literature
through biblometric positioning during three decades. Library Philosophy and
Practice, 5749. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=10615&context=libphilprac
Erickson, L. E., & Jennings, M. (2017). Energy,
transportation, air quality, climate change, health nexus: Sustainable energy
is good for our health. AIMS Public Health, 4(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2017.1.47
Kåberger, T. (2018). Progress of renewable electricity replacing
fossil fuels. Global Energy Interconnection, 1(1), 48-52. https://doi.org/10.14171/j.2096-5117.gei.2018.01.006
Kirsch, S. (2020). Running out? Rethinking resource depletion. The Extractive Industries and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.06.002
Kumar, M. (2020). Social, economic, and environmental impacts of renewable energy resources. In K. E. Okedu, A. Tahour, & A. G. Aissaou (Eds.), Wind solar hybrid renewable energy system. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89494
Lorensia, A., Suryadinata, R. V., &
Fitrianingsih, N. (2020). Knowledge of sunlight exposure toward obesity in
geriatric. Farmasains: Jurnal Farmasi Dan Ilmu Kesehatan, 5(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.22219/farmasains.v5i1.11454
Muttana, S. B., Dey, R. K., & Sardar, A. (2017).
Prospects of electric bus integrated with solar photovoltaic cells. SAE
Technical Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-26-0109
Nyiri, P. (2005). Sun protection in Singapore's schools. Singapore
Medical Journal, 46(9), 471-475. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.597.2005&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Rehman, S., Rehman, E., Mumtaz, A., & Jianglin, Z. (2022). A
multicriteria decision-making approach in exploring the nexus between wind and
solar energy generation, economic development, fossil fuel consumption, and CO2
emissions. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 819384. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.819384
Sek, S. K., Teo, X. Q., & Wong, Y. N. (2015). A comparative
study on the effects of oil price changes on inflation. Procedia Economics and
Finance, 26, 630–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00800-x
Stephen F. L. (2005). Fossil fuels in the 21st century. Ambio,
34(8), 621–627. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4315666
Wijoyo, S., & Prihatiningtyas, W. (2019). Forest-fire-related
environmental issues in Indonesia. Environmental Policy and Law, 49(3),
142–144. https://doi.org/10.3233/epl-190149
Xue, F., & Gwee, E. (2017). Electric vehicle
development in Singapore and technical considerations for charging
infrastructure. Energy Procedia, 143, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.640
Comments
Post a Comment